Boris Johnson suggested that “bodies could pile high” during a heated discussion in No 10 in the autumn about lockdown, sources familiar with the conversation have said.
On Monday, the Daily Mail reported that Mr Johnson had said “let the bodies pile high in their thousands” rather than order a third lockdown.
The PM denied making the remarks, adding that lockdowns had worked.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said he was “astonished” by the reports.
He added that: “Everybody would be deeply concerned, not least all those families who have lost someone in the pandemic.”
The government is also facing questions over possible donations made to re-decorate the prime minister’s flat, and an investigation into leaked information about England’s second lockdown.
The “pile high” comments are said to have been made at the end of October when the government announced there would be a second lockdown in England following a sharp rise in coronavirus cases.
At the time, the prime minister was reported to have had big concerns about the implications of another lockdown on the economy and non-Covid related health issues.
“This does take us back to that moment and back to the very serious claims made by some people who were involved in the decision making – including some ministers – that the hesitancy around the second lockdown did cost lives,” she said.
Asked about the comments earlier on Monday, Mr Johnson denied having made them adding that the public wanted the government “to make sure that the lockdowns work, and they have,” he said.
The PM’s spokesman also said the reported comments were false adding: “This is untrue and the PM has denied it… I’m not aware of anyone else making that statement.”
Mr Johnson was also defended by Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove who told MPs he had “never heard” the prime minister suggest that “bodies could pile high”.
He said he was in the room during conversations about the lockdown but “never heard language of that kind.”
Lockdown leak
This comes amid a bitter row between Downing Street and the prime minister’s former senior adviser Dominic Cummings.
Last week, Mr Cummings published a blog in which he:
- denied leaking text messages sent between Mr Johnson and businessman Sir James Dyson
- accused the PM of planning to have donors “secretly pay” for the refurbishment of his flat
- denied leaking details of November’s second coronavirus lockdown in England
- claimed Cabinet Secretary Simon Case had cleared Mr Cummings of being the source of the leak
- alleged Mr Johnson had considered trying to block an inquiry into the leak in case it involved a friend of his fiancee Carrie Symonds
Earlier, Mr Case gave evidence at an MPs’ committee and said the inquiry into the second lockdown leak is ongoing, however he added that “given the time that has now passed, I think it’s probable the team will not successfully identify the source or sources”.
A Cabinet Office source said that no-one had yet been exonerated in the investigation.
Asked if he would launch an inquiry into the leak of the prime minister’s lockdown comments, Mr Case said he would have to discuss that with Mr Johnson.
Flat refurbishment
Responding to questions over the funding of his flat refurbishment, Mr Johnson said: “If there’s anything to be said about that, any declaration to be made, that will of course be made in due course.”
The prime minister receives an annual public grant of £30,000 to spend on the flat – however, there have been reports that work on his flat could have cost as much as £200,000.
Over the weekend, ministers had said the prime minister “personally paid the bill” for the flat but did not answer questions on whether a Tory party donor initially provided the money to him.
This raises questions over transparency as political parties are supposed to report any donations or loans if they are above £7,500, while MPs have to declare any donations – within 28 days – which could influence their actions.
The government is also supposed to publish a list of ministers’ financial interests twice a year, but the last one was released in July 2020.
Speaking to the BBC, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said this would be published soon.
Labour’s shadow minister Rachel Reeves accused Mr Johnson of trying to “cover up payments for the luxury refurbishment” adding “the prime minister is now corrupting the standards of public life expected in high office.”
Her party has called on the Electoral Commission, which regulates political donations in the UK, to launch a formal investigation.
The watchdog has said it is talking to the Conservative Party about whether the spending on the flat falls within its remit.
Mr Case – the country’s top civil servant – said he would review how the refurbishment was paid for.
Speaking in Wrexham, Mr Johnson said the public were more interested in what the government was doing to move the country “cautiously but irreversibly through the steps of the road map to unlock and to get our country going”.
He said the disease was “under control” and that deaths and hospitalisations were low but added “that doesn’t mean that we’ve got it totally licked.”
“We’ve got to be realistic about that; unfortunately, there probably will be another wave of the disease.”